سند شماره 1

سند شماره 1( صفحه 2- امر لوی سارنوال افغانستان)

محترمه قدسیه جان رییسه خشونت علیه زنان!

این دفعه خشونت بر عکس علیه مردان بعمل آمده. قضیه و شکایت چندین جنبه دارد. مکمل بررسی گردد. موضوعات حقوقی و جزایی آن تفکیک، اجراات گردد.

در مورد جلوگیری از مظاهرات از دیپلومات محترم معذرت خواسته شود زیرا هر کس حق دارد اعتراض و شکایات و مظاهره نماید.

25- 11- 1390

Document No 1. Attorney General’s Office’s order

Dear Respected Qudsia jan, Head of Department of Elimination of Violence against women,

This time, there has been violence against men. This case and complaint has many dimensions. It must all be studied. The criminal and rights parts of it must be differentiated and implemented.

Regarding the request from the respectful diplomat (Hazrat Wahriz) to prevent protests, we apologize we can’t do anything because everyone has a right to complain or protest.

25/11/1390

Wahriz’s request:

To Attorney General,

I am Gholam Hazrat Wahriz and I have been working at Ministry of Foreign Affairs in different department since 1383/2004.

I married to Batul Moradi in same year and divorced her in 1387/2008 because she did not do her duties as a wife (Nushoz). My former wife complained to family court for her marriage-portion (Mahr). This case was investigated and the court judged. The mentioned lady did not refer to court again. So according to laws, the case was closed supposedly the dispute was ended. But this lady did not accept the court’s decision after one year and she requested for appeal. Hence the case was investigated again and the court sent the case to Hoqoq Office in concerned district. She did not follow up the case again, and then again according to laws the case was closed supposedly the dispute was ended. Once again, the mentioned lady went to law in 1390/2011. The case is still under process and this woman is absent in court sessions. In the same time, this woman has complained against me in different departments of Attorney General Office, AIHRC, Hoqoq offices and NGOs. Now she is going to disgrace me with a demonstration which is going to be held by an NGO by name of Young Women for Change due to her close relations with this NGO. This woman and mentioned NGO have been starting disgracing and dishonoring me at online media.

This woman claims that I insult her with suspecting that her second son is not mine. However, I have asked her to do DNA parentage test before and after divorce in court, but the mentioned lady has not accepted to do that.

I have paid this lady enough money for alimony to her and my son after divorce. Also I have sent money to Afghanistan General Consulate in Mashhad while she lived there. Although the General Consul sent five letters to her and made phone calls, but she refused accepting money. I have requested this lady to open a banking account with presence of her lawyer, court team and judge that I could transfer the alimony of my son to her banking account regularly every month.  However, she has not accepted any of my suggestions and she is disgracing me. Since the disgracing, insulting and spoiling the spiritual peace of people are criminal, I am requesting the respected Attorney General to please assign the relevant attorney department to stop a demonstration which aimed to disgrace me as perpetrator of violence against women without final court judgment. Also I am requesting the respected Attorney General to please oblige this lady to do DNA parenting test to remove all doubts. 

سند شماره 2

سند شماره 2

لوی سارنوالی جمهوری اسلامی افغانستان

ریاست سارنوالی استیناف زون غرب کابل

سارنوالی آمریت عمومی تحقیق جرایم. کمیته تحقیق جرایم متفرقه

اتهامنامه

قسمت تشریحی: مسمات بتول بنت قربانعلی مسکونه ناحیه ششم شهر کابل علیه اسامی غلام حضرت شوهرش دعوی حقوقی و فامیلی داشته است مبنی بر اینکه تهدید به مرگ و توهین و تحقیر و مجبور نمودن به اعمال نامشروع در ریاست سارنوالی مبارزه با خشونت علیه زنان لوی سارنوالی بوده در نتیجه موضوع شان به حقوق ولایت کابل می رود در نتیجه حقوق اوراق موضوع را به محکمه محترم روان که بعدا در قسمت موضوع حقوقی شان محکمه تصمیم می گیرد که پارچه ابلاغ نقل آن درج اوراق می باشد.

اوراق موضوع بلاخره تفکیک، جنبه جزایی آن به سارنوالی ، حقوقی آن به حقوق می رود . اوراق موضوع به کمیته جرایم تحقیق متفرقه . بعد از پیشنهاد کمیته تحقیق جرایم اخلاقی بناع به هدایت مقام محترم ریاست لوی سارنوالی موضوع چون توهین و تحقیر به پولیس مطرح بوده به کمیته متفرقه غرض تعقیب عدلی سپرده می شود.

از لابلای اوراق ارسالی معلوم می شود که سارنوالی اختصاسی مبارزه با خشونت علیه زنان طی مکتوب نمبر (26) 14- 1- 1391 خویش اوراق قضیه ادعای لت و کوبی مسمات بتول بنت قربانعلی به مظنونیت غلام حضرت ولد خادم علی که تحت کار کمیته موظف تحقیق آن ریاست قرار داشته. جریان تحقیق، اسامی غلام حضرت طی عریضه مطبوع خویش علیه مسمات بتول عنوانی مقام محترم لوی سارنوالی ارایه داشته. محترم لوی سارنوال صاحب درخصوص عریضه مذکور چنین احکام ارشاد فرمودند: این قضیه بر عکس خشونت علیه مرد است قضیه مکمل بررسی گردد موضوع حقوقی و جزایی آن تفکیک به ریاست حقوق کابل ارسال گردیده که در حصه جنبه جزایی آن اوراق به سارنوالی مواصلت ورزیده است. مسمات بتول بنت قربانعلی تحت جلب قرار داده شد. براساس استعلام مورخ 23- 2- 1391 مدیریت مبارزه با جرایم جنایی حوزه ششم  شهر کابل و نظر به هدایت مقام محترم ریاست سارنوالی استیناف  زون غرب سارنوال صاحب محمد فرید در قضیه گرفتاری مسمات بتول توظیف گردیده بود. مسمات بتول موظفین پولیس را که به منظور احضاریت موصوفه در حضور داشت نماینده سارنوالی به محل رفته بودند که از طرف مسمات بتول بنت قربانعلی تمام موظفین پولیس به شمول نماینده سارنوالی مورد توهین و تحقیر قرار می گیرند و  معکذا دشنام، تهدید می شوند که از طرف هیئت محضر توهین و تحقیر نیز ترتیب می شود که محضر ترتیب شده درج اوراق می باشد.

قابل ملاحظه است بعدا  به منظور تعقیب عدلی اوراق قضیه را به کمیته جرایم متفرقه سپرده اند. به ملاحظه اوراق ابتدایی قضیه و قرار محضر توهین و تحقیر و تهدید و دشنام که ترتیب گردید دارای امضا چندین تن از منسوبین امنیتی و نماینده محترم سارنوالی نیز می باشد که از طرف مسمات بتول مورد تهدید و دشنام و تحقیر قرار گرفته اند. محضر گرفتار متهم با امضا و نشانی می باشد!         

بنا به عقیده ما هیات تحقیق معلوم می شود که مسمات بتول یک شخص .... بوده به قانون اعتنا نداشته موظفین و مسئولین امنیتی را به تاریخ 25- 2- 1391 مورد توهین قرار داد.

در مربوطات ناحیه ششم شهر کابل مسئولین امور به منظور تطبیق قانون و حاکم بودن قانون در افغانستان باز هم از طرف یک تعداد اشخاص و افراد مورد توهین و تحقیر قرار می گیرند جای تاسف است بنا مسمات بتول بنت قربانعلی خانم غلام حضرت در قضیه توهین و تحقیر موظفین امنیتی و سارنوالی موظف شده کسب الزامیت نموده چون موظفین را مورد دشنام و توهین قرار داده مطابق ماده (294) قانون جزای کشور قابل تعقیب عدلی پنداشته می شود.

Document No. 2

Attorney General of Afghanistan

Directorate attorney general of West zone- Kabul

General sub- directorate of attorney general of crimes inquiry- Committee of inquiry of miscellaneous crimes.  

Indictment

Descriptive section: Madame. Batul daughter of Qurban Ali resident of 6^th district of Kabul claimed that his ex- husband Mr.Ghulam Hazraat his beaten her and threat her to death. The plaintiff accused the defendant for asking illegal sex relationship. The case is registered with the Directorate of attorney general in violence against the women in attorney general of Afghanistan. Subsequently, the case is sent to Hoqoq directorate where the office has sent the case to court. The court make decision to declare the warrant.

Finally the case is separated to two suits: legal suit and criminal suit. The legal case was sent to Hoqouq while the criminal suit was assigned to attorney general. The latent office has sent the case and its related documents to Committee of inquiry of miscellaneous crimes. According to the attorney general office, since the case was related moral values (threaten and disrespect) of the police, it was submitted to Committee of inquiry of miscellaneous crimes.           

After inquiries it was cleared the attorney general dedicated to violence against the women has been working on the indictment of Batul daughter of Qurban against Ghulam Hazrat. In judicial hearing the Ghulam Hazart submit an indictment against the Batul in the attorney general office. The attorney general orders that the lawsuit is against the man (the Ghulam Hazart). So the case should be assessed completely. Thus the criminal suit and legal suit are separated. The criminal suit related documents were sent to attorney general and legal suit documents were assigned to Hoqoq directorate.

The warrant was declared for Batul. According to inquiry letter (issued in 23/2/1391) of sub-directorate of counter against criminal crimes of 6^th district and due to the attorney general office Mohammad Farid, attorney general, was assigned for arrest of Batul. She insulted the police in presence of representative of attorney general. The Batul accuses and threaten the police. Thus judicial delegations submit an indictment against her claiming disrespect of the Batul. The complaint is added to the documents.  

Following the required enforcements, the office has assigned the case to Committee of miscellaneous crimes. The judicial registry statement was written after of primary related document. The judicial document was based on disrespect and intimidation of authorities by the Batul. The attorney general and some security authorities has singed under the indictment. The arrest notice has signature and signs!

According to us (inquiry delegation) the Batul is stupid person and she has not any respect of code and regulations. She has insulted the security staff on 25/2/1391.  When the 6^th district authorities of Kabul city and attorney general‘s representative were assigned to enforce the code, they were insulted. It’s not normal. So its requested that the Batul be scrutinized according to the article No (294) of the penal code.    

سند شماره 3

سند شماره 3

لوی سارنوالی جمهوری اسلامی افغانستان

ریاست سارنوالی استیناف زون غرب

سارنوالی ابتداییه امنیت عامه

صورت دعوی

فشرده جریان قضیه: مسمات بتول با غلام حضرت شوهرش دعوی حقوقی و فامیلی داشته که اوراق در سارنوالی مبارزه با خشونت علیه زنان لوی سارنوالی بوده که در نتیجه اوراق به حقوق ولایت کابل می رود که اوراق به محکمه محول گردید که محکمه در مورد موضوع حقوقی شان تصمیم می گیرد که پارچه ابلاغ ضم اوراق می باشد.

بخش جزایی قضیه به سارنوالی، کمیته متفرقه سپر ده می شود. در جریان تحقیق چنین بر می آید که سارنوالی اختصاصی مبارزه با خشونت علیه زنان طی مکتوب (26) 14- 1- 1391 خویش اوراق ادعای لت و کوبی مسمات بتول به مظنونیت غلام حضرت ولد خادم علی را که تحت کار کمیته موظف تحقیق قرارداشته در جریان تحقیق غلام حضرت طی ورقه عرض خویش علیه مسمات بتول عنوانی مقام لوی سارنوالی ارایه داشته که مقام محترم لوی سارنوالی صاحب چنین احکام ارشاد فرموده: اوراق قضیه برعکس خشونت علیه مرد است، قضیه مکمل بررسی شود. موضوع حقوقی و جزایی آن تفکیک، به ریاست حقوق کابل ارسال گردیده درمورد جزایی مسمات بتول تحت جلب قرار داده شده که بالاثر استعلام 23- 2- 91 مدیریت مبارزه با جرایم حوزه سوم شهر کابل و نظر به هدایت  مقام محترم ریاست سارنوالی استیناف زون غرب سارنوال صاحب احمد فرید در قضیه گرفتاری مسمات بتول توظیف گردیده بود. مسمات بتول موظفین پولیس را که به منظور احضاریت موصوفه در حضور داشت نماینده سارنوالی به محل رفته بودند به تمام موظفین به شمول نماینده سارنوالی مورد توهین و تحقیر از طرف بتول گردیده و دشنام داده شده اند که از طرف هیات محضر  توهین و تحقیر قرار می گیرد که محضر توهین، تحقیر و دشنام به امضا چندتن از پولیس ونماینده سارنوالی ترتیب گردیده است. به رویت اوراق مسمات بتول یک شخص ماجراجو بوده و به قانون اعتنا نداشته که حتی موظفین را به تاریخ 25- 2- 91 مورد توهین و تحقیر و دشنام قرار می دهد. بنابراین مسمات بتول درمورد توهین و تحقیر و دشنام  کسب الزامیت نموده، طبق ماده 294 قانون جزای کشور قابل مجازات می باشد و از محکمه محترم خواهشمند تا نامبرده را طبق ماده پیش بینی شده مجازات نمایند.

Document No3

The attorney general of Afghanistan

Directorate attorney general of West zone- Kabul

Primary attorney general of public security

Complaint

Summary of case: Mrs. Batul and her ex-husband, Ghulam Hazart, have legal suit and family suit. Their required documents were sent to attorney general of violence against the women. After required inquiries the documents were sent to Huqoq of Kabul city. The office sent the case to court where the office solved the legal suit. The notice is attached, too. 

Criminal suit is sent to Committee of miscellaneous crimes. After inquiries it was cleared that the attorney general of counter violence against the women has been working on the indictment of Batul daughter of Qurban against Ghulam Hazrat in effect of letter No (26)/14/1/1391. In judicial hearing the Ghulam Hazart submit an indictment against the Batul in the attorney general office. The attorney general orders that the law suit is against the man (the Ghulam Hazart). So the case should be assessed completely.

Legal suit and criminal suit were separated. Legal case was sent to Hoqoq of Kabul city. In criminal suit According to inquiry letter (issued in 23/2/1391) of sub-directorate of counter against criminal crimes of 6^th district and due to the attorney general office Mohammad Farid, attorney general, was assigned for arrest of Batul. She insulted the police in presence of representative of attorney general. Thus judicial delegations submit an indictment against her claiming disrespect of the Batul. The complaint is added to the documents.  

Following the required enforcements, the office has assigned the case to Committee of miscellaneous crimes. The judicial registry statement was written after of primary related document. The judicial document was based on disrespect and intimidation of authorities by the Batul. The attorney general and some security authorities has singed under the indictment. The arrest notice has signature and signs!

According to us (inquiry delegation) the Batul is stupid person and she has not any respect of code and regulations. She has insulted the security staff on 25/2/1391.  When the 6^th district authorities of Kabul city and attorney general ‘s representative were assigned to enforce the code, they were insulted.. So its requested that the Batul be punished according to the article No (294) of the penal code.